Quantcast
Channel: CRM Development forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8223

n:n or 1:n from contact to itself - Problems in handling. Should i do that?

$
0
0

Hi,

i want to have accounts, contacts and groups (of contacts).
My wish is, to have a relationship from contact to contact und make a new form "group of contacts" on which i relate to contacts, that are the contacts in this Group.

for your info. I do not prefer to do it in another/new entity "Group", because of the number of lookups that are possible to account, contact, Group.
If i have a custom entity and it must be possible to link to a contact, or an account, or a Group .. i have to create 3 different lookups on the custom entity form.

I tried to do the above, but there are different Problems understanding the self referential 1:n / n:n relationships.

1) If i creat a 1:n relationship from contact to contact, there is a lookup. This is rejected, because

- a contact can be in many Groups of contacts
- a Group of contacts can have many contacts

If i understood right, this means, that a n:n relationship is needed.

2) So i created the n:n from contact to contact an on one side i named it "Group of contacts" (the side which Shows from the contact (f.e. customer) to the Groups, in which this contact is in .. and on the other side i named it "members (contacts) of the Group (of contacts)".

So far so good. I thought .. ok, this sounds good, but...

No matter what i try and do, i can only see one side of the n:n title (Name), f.e. "Group of contacts" ...
but i neeeeeeed to Show on the customer (contact) -Form: the side "alle the Groups of contacts (in which this customer (contact) is a member) ... and on the other side, this is the "Group of contacts"-Form .. i Need to Show the other side of the n:n, named "members (contacts) of the Group (of contacts)".

But i can only choose from 1 side.

Is this by design, or did i something wrong?
.. or do i have to use Manual n:n? .. but how? I already have difficulties, understanding the Manual n:n's, but doing a Manual n:n in the same entity ... this really sounds weired.

Could anyone understand my Intention .. and can help me find the solution?

many thx, Greets Pit


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8223

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>